Theory Analysis Dead Poets Society Essay Example For Students

Theory Analysis Dead Poets Society Essay The Marxist theory targets the flaws in capitalism where the bourgeoisie, who are rich owners, are able to control the proletariat (working class). According the Karl Marx, the bourgeoisie can control education, politics, media, etc due to their wealth. Due to the inequality, Karl Marx predicted that the proletariat would start a revolution. Karl Marx believes that capitalism leads to communication where society only cares about impressing others and conspicuous consumption. Karl Marx believes that communism would make the bourgeoisie and the proletariat equal so people wouldnt determine their lives based on their economic circumstance. The Marxist theory proves that In the Dead Poets Society the capitalist system does not work In the school because of Knells Irrational action to commit suicide. If the school had run In a communist approach, Nell could have easily expressed his feelings about acting towards the principle and his father. We will write a custom essay on Theory Analysis Dead Poets Society specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now The students and parents took on he role of a proletariat by following the professors orders while the professors and Nils father took on the role of a bourgeoisie. Interpolation had also occurred within the movie because the parents and students were taught to believe from professors that success is only achieved through only studying. As Karl Marx predicted, the students had started a revolution by getting on their desks to rebel against the professor. I enjoyed watching the feminism criticism presentation because the restoration targets that the Dead Poets Society was only revolved around a masculine point of view. I found it interesting because they were able to find that the female characters followed the stereotype of being quiet and always listening to others. As well, I felt that they were accurate that females were viewed as a sexual object because there was a scene with an image of a nude woman. This criticism can be compared to Marxist theory because if everyone lived in a communist approach everyone including females would be able to treated in live equally.

Creationism VS Evolution essays

Creationism VS Evolution essays Evolution is not only improbable but clearly impossible. Extensive evidence against evolution is uncovered with every major scientific discovery. Every evolutionist "fact" can easily be rebuked by creationists. Twelve supposed hominoids have been discovered and presented as supporting evidence to evolution. While in all actuality nine of the twelve supposed hominids are actually extinct species of ape. While the remaining three are completely developed humans. Neanderthals were once considered pre-humans by evolutionists but recent studies have shown that the Neanderthals are completely developed humans (Homo sapiens) suffering from bone diseases caused by vitamin D deficiency. Many textbooks still display Neanderthals as pre-humans, which, for the sake of scientific accuracy, needs to be corrected. There have been many mistakes and hoaxes involving early humans. The Nebraska man was "discovered" in 1922. It was made famous by Henry Osborn of the American museum of natural history. This tooth was used at the Scopes "monkey" trial in 1925 as irrefutable evidence of the animal ancestry of man. This specimen was so overblown that a "picture" of the Nebraska man and his wife were pub lished in the London daily news, all from a tooth. When the rest of the skeleton of the beast were found in 1927, it turned out to be noting but an extinct pig. In addition, because of this mishap, evolution has been taught as fact in our public schools. The evolutionists believe that new traits come about by chance, by random changes in genes called "mutations. That may be great for the evolutionists but in the real world, mutations are responsible for genetic defects, including hemophilia, albinism, and certain kinds of cancer and brain malfunction. Neo-Darwinists, commonly called evolutionists, believe that mutations are the raw material of evolution. The intelligent design scientists (not creationists) response in a simple mutations...